Capability
Connect adversary insight to secure product engineering.
Practice threat modeling, secure coding, automated security testing, supply-chain assurance and remediation inside isolated software-delivery environments.
CLIP · Pipeline findings
Illustrative view- PipelineBUILD-2026-3312 · passed with policy gate
- Findings by controlInput validation 2 · Secrets 0
- Software bill of materialsGenerated · 412 components
- ProvenanceSigned · attestation verified
- Recurrence testAdded for closed weakness class
Illustrative pipeline output. Component counts are synthetic.
Mission problems
What this capability addresses.
- The same weakness classes recur release after release
- Security testing is bolted on at the end rather than designed in
- Supply-chain risk is invisible without a software bill of materials
- Exploitation findings never reach the design decision that permitted them
- Learners are assessed on finding bugs rather than on preventing recurrence
Capability modules
What is included.
Modules are composable. A pathway combines the ones a role actually needs.
- Requirements, misuse cases and threat modeling
- Secure coding and peer review
- Static, dynamic, composition, secret, infrastructure and container scanning
- Software bill of materials, signing and provenance verification
- Vulnerable-by-design applications under promotion controls
- Exploit-to-defect-to-fix traceability
- Supply-chain compromise exercises
End-to-end workflow
How the work flows.
- 01Requirement
- 02Threat
- 03Build
- 04Verify
- 05Attack
- 06Remediate
- 07Re-test
- 08Attest
In sequence: A requirement is threat-modelled before it is built, verified by automated testing, attacked in a contained environment, remediated at root cause, re-tested for recurrence, then attested with a signed artifact and its provenance.
Representative scenario
One scenario, end to end.
A malicious dependency is introduced into an isolated build pipeline. Learners detect it through composition analysis, trace its reach through the software bill of materials, contain the affected artifacts and verify the remediation with a regression test.
Evidence produced
- Threat model and identified misuse cases
- Code change with review record
- Scan results grouped by control rather than severity alone
- Software bill of materials and signed artifact
- Finding linked to exploit evidence, source component, fix and test
Evidence and metrics
What you can measure.
These are the operational measures the platform produces. Baselines and targets are set with each organization during a pilot rather than claimed in advance.
- Remediation quality
- Vulnerability recurrence by class
- Pipeline policy compliance
- Escaped defects
- Artifact provenance completeness
Safety and trust
Deliberately weak applications stay inside the laboratory.
Vulnerable-by-design applications can never be promoted as approved artifacts
Exercise pipelines are isolated from production delivery systems
Weaknesses are implemented in reviewed first-party code, not by importing obsolete frameworks
Every scenario declares exactly which control is intentionally weakened
See this capability against your mission.
We will tailor the demonstration around your priority use case and operating constraints.