Skip to main content

Capability

Rehearse realistic cyber missions without risking operational systems.

Provision isolated environments, coordinate multi-team exercises, deliver injects, capture telemetry and produce traceable after-action evidence from reusable scenario packages.

CLIP · Scenario orchestration

Illustrative view
  • ExerciseEX-2026-014 · Identity breach rehearsal
  • Range statusReady · boundary checks passed
  • ParticipantsRed 4 · Blue 6 · White 2 · Gold 3
  • Egress policyDefault deny · 0 exceptions
  • Emergency stopArmed · independent control path

Synthetic exercise data. No real environment identifiers are shown.

Mission problems

What this capability addresses.

  • Laboratories are rebuilt by hand for every cohort, with inconsistent configuration
  • Red actions and Blue detections cannot be correlated after the fact
  • Exercise scoring is subjective and difficult to reproduce
  • Offensive tooling is used without enforceable boundaries
  • Scenario development effort is duplicated across teams and institutions

Capability modules

What is included.

Modules are composable. A pathway combines the ones a role actually needs.

  • Virtual machine, container, network and application laboratories
  • Capture-the-flag and mission-objective challenges
  • Tabletop and inject-driven exercise control
  • Red-versus-Blue and collaborative Purple exercises
  • Wargame control, scoring and adjudication
  • Optional OT/ICS, cloud, mobile, IoT and AI-security ranges

End-to-end workflow

How the work flows.

  1. 01Design
  2. 02Review
  3. 03Schedule
  4. 04Provision
  5. 05Validate
  6. 06Run
  7. 07Seal evidence
  8. 08Review
  9. 09Improve

In sequence: A scenario is designed and reviewed, scheduled against a cohort, provisioned from approved templates, validated against readiness checks, run under exercise control, then its evidence is sealed, reviewed and converted into improvement actions.

Representative scenario

One scenario, end to end.

A controlled web-application intrusion exercise in which Red Team actions, Blue Team detections, White Team injects, Gold Team decisions and Purple Team findings are correlated on one timeline.

Evidence produced

  • Objective completion against the exercise plan
  • Technique-to-detection mapping
  • Response milestones with timestamps
  • Rules of Engagement and safety events
  • Scoring-rule version used
  • Assessor adjudication and rationale

Evidence and metrics

What you can measure.

These are the operational measures the platform produces. Baselines and targets are set with each organization during a pilot rather than claimed in advance.

  • Lab provisioning time from approved templates
  • Scenario reuse across cohorts
  • Inject delivery accuracy
  • Scoring consistency between assessors
  • After-action closure rate

Safety and trust

Realism stays inside declared boundaries.

  • Target allowlists bind every exercise to declared assets

  • Default-deny egress applies to all range workloads

  • Exercise safety monitoring runs independently of learner-controlled systems

  • Malware-enabled laboratories use additionally restricted enclaves

  • Emergency stop remains available when exercise workloads fail

See the full trust model

See this capability against your mission.

We will tailor the demonstration around your priority use case and operating constraints.

Cyber Range & Wargaming | CLIP